EXPOSURE TO AI
47%
MODERATE
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
6%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Half in the fire, half out. Choose which half you become.
47% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. In the blast radius. A real slice of the work is already automatable. The rest isn’t.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Document patients' medical and psychological histories, physical assessment results, diagnoses, treatment plans, prescriptions, or outcomes
- Participate in activities aimed at professional growth and development, including conferences or continuing education activities
- Evaluate patients' behavior to formulate diagnoses or assess treatments
- Distinguish between physiologically- and psychologically-based disorders, and diagnose appropriately
- Assess patients' mental and physical status, based on the presenting symptoms and complaints
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Collaborate with interdisciplinary team members, including psychiatrists, psychologists, or nursing staff, to develop, implement, or evaluate treatment plans
- Administer medications, including those administered by injection
- Conduct individual, group, or family psychotherapy for those with chronic or acute mental disorders
- Direct or provide home health services
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 47% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16