OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
0%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Lightly singed at worst. Carry on.
24% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Mostly safe. AI helps around the edges, but the job stays human.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Keep records of maintenance and repair work
- Operate computer-aided drafting and design applications to design avionics system modifications
- Coordinate work with that of engineers, technicians, and other aircraft maintenance personnel
- Lay out installation of aircraft assemblies and systems, following documentation such as blueprints, manuals, and wiring diagrams
- Interpret flight test data to diagnose malfunctions and systemic performance problems
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Test and troubleshoot instruments, components, and assemblies, using circuit testers, oscilloscopes, or voltmeters
- Adjust, repair, or replace malfunctioning components or assemblies, using hand tools or soldering irons
- Install electrical and electronic components, assemblies, and systems in aircraft, using hand tools, power tools, or soldering irons
- Set up and operate ground support and test equipment to perform functional flight tests of electrical and electronic systems
- Assemble components such as switches, electrical controls, and junction boxes, using hand tools or soldering irons
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 24% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16