EXPOSURE TO AI
44%
MODERATE
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
0%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Half in the fire, half out. Choose which half you become.
44% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. In the blast radius. A real slice of the work is already automatable. The rest isn’t.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Write or prepare detailed clinical neuropsychological reports, using data from psychological or neuropsychological tests, self-report measures, rating scales, direct observations, or interviews
- Compare patients' progress before and after pharmacologic, surgical, or behavioral interventions
- Design or implement rehabilitation plans for patients with cognitive dysfunction
- Establish neurobehavioral baseline measures for monitoring progressive cerebral disease or recovery
- Identify and communicate risks associated with specific neurological surgical procedures, such as epilepsy surgery
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Educate and supervise practicum students, psychology interns, or hospital staff
- Provide education or counseling to individuals and families
- Provide psychotherapy, behavior therapy, or other counseling interventions to patients with neurological disorders
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 44% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16