OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
0%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Lightly singed at worst. Carry on.
32% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Mostly safe. AI helps around the edges, but the job stays human.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Maintain updated client records with plans, notes, appropriate forms, or related information
- Interpret, translate, or provide cultural mediation related to health services or information for community members
- Advise clients or community groups on issues related to improving general health, such as diet or exercise
- Refer community members to needed health services
- Contact clients in person, by phone, or in writing to ensure they have completed required or recommended actions
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Identify or contact members of high-risk or otherwise targeted groups, such as members of minority populations, low-income populations, or pregnant women
- Distribute flyers, brochures, or other informational or educational documents to inform members of a targeted community
- Attend community meetings or health fairs to understand community issues or build relationships with community members
- Perform basic diagnostic procedures, such as blood pressure screening, breast cancer screening, or communicable disease screening
- Administer immunizations or other basic preventive treatments
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 32% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16