OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
n/a
Not yet measured in the Anthropic Economic Index. The exposure figure is a capability estimate only.
The robots can help. They can’t replace the room you read.
22% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Mostly safe. AI helps around the edges, but the job stays human.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Prepare and maintain work records and reports of information such as employee time and wages, daily receipts, or inspection results
- Quote prices to customers
- Plan work schedules and assign duties to maintain adequate staff for effective performance of activities and response to fluctuating workloads
- Estimate material, time, and staffing requirements for a given project, based on work orders, job specifications, and experience
- Evaluate employee performance and prepare performance appraisals
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Inform designated employees or departments of items loaded or problems encountered
- Collaborate with workers and managers to solve work-related problems
- Inspect equipment for wear and for conformance to specifications
- Conduct staff meetings to relay general information or to address specific topics, such as safety
- Resolve personnel problems, complaints, or formal grievances when possible, or refer them to higher-level supervisors for resolution
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 22% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16