COOKEDthe AI job-risk monitorSYSTEM LIVE
◀ scan anotherGAMBLING CAGE WORKERSshare ⧉
EXPOSURE TO AI
42%
MODERATE
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
7%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Half in the fire, half out. Choose which half you become.

42% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. In the blast radius. A real slice of the work is already automatable. The rest isn’t.

WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
  • Provide customers with information about casino operations
  • Prepare reports, including assignment of company funds or recording of department revenues
  • Count funds and reconcile daily summaries of transactions to balance books
  • Prepare bank deposits, balancing assigned funds as necessary
  • Verify accuracy of reports, such as authorization forms, transaction reconciliations, or exchange summary reports
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
  • Maintain cage security
  • Supply currency, coins, chips, or gaming checks to other departments as needed
  • Provide assistance in the training and orientation of new cashiers
  • Follow all gaming regulations
  • Convert gaming checks, coupons, tokens, or coins to currency for gaming patrons
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY)  | how this is calculated  | last updated 2026-07-16