COOKEDthe AI job-risk monitorSYSTEM LIVE
◀ scan anotherJUDICIAL LAW CLERKSshare ⧉
EXPOSURE TO AI
52%
HIGH
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
17%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Still standing — but the ground is warm.

52% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Heavily exposed. Most of the tasks are within reach of today’s AI.

WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
  • Draft or proofread judicial opinions, decisions, or citations
  • Enter information into computerized court calendar, filing, or case management systems
  • Verify that all files, complaints, or other papers are available and in the proper order
  • Prepare briefs, legal memoranda, or statements of issues involved in cases, including appropriate suggestions or recommendations
  • Research laws, court decisions, documents, opinions, briefs, or other information related to cases before the court
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
  • Participate in conferences or discussions between trial attorneys and judges
  • Supervise law students, volunteers, or other personnel assigned to the court
  • Perform courtroom duties, including calling calendars, administering oaths, and swearing in jury panels and witnesses
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY)  | how this is calculated  | last updated 2026-07-16