COOKEDthe AI job-risk monitorSYSTEM LIVE
◀ scan anotherMEDICAL SCIENTISTS, EXCEPT EPIDEMIOLOGISTSshare ⧉
EXPOSURE TO AI
52%
HIGH
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
4%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Still standing — but the ground is warm.

52% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Heavily exposed. Most of the tasks are within reach of today’s AI.

WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
  • Write and publish articles in scientific journals
  • Write applications for research grants
  • Evaluate effects of drugs, gases, pesticides, parasites, and microorganisms at various levels
  • Plan and direct studies to investigate human or animal disease, preventive methods, and treatments for disease
  • Conduct research to develop methodologies, instrumentation, and procedures for medical application, analyzing data and presenting findings to the scientific audience and general public
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
  • Follow strict safety procedures when handling toxic materials to avoid contamination
  • Use equipment such as atomic absorption spectrometers, electron microscopes, flow cytometers, or chromatography systems
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY)  | how this is calculated  | last updated 2026-07-16