COOKEDthe AI job-risk monitorSYSTEM LIVE
◀ scan anotherNEWS ANALYSTS, REPORTERS, AND JOURNALISTSshare ⧉
EXPOSURE TO AI
65%
SEVERE
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
21%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
Well done. And by that we mean: cooked.

65% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Deeply cooked. Almost the entire task list is something a model can already attempt.

WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
  • Write commentaries, columns, or scripts, using computers
  • Revise work to meet editorial approval or to fit time or space requirements
  • Review and evaluate notes taken about news events to isolate pertinent facts and details
  • Review written, audio, or video copy, and correct errors in content, grammar, or punctuation, following prescribed editorial style and formatting guidelines
  • Discuss issues with editors to establish priorities or positions
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
  • Almost nothing here is clearly out of reach. That’s the warning in this one.
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY)  | how this is calculated  | last updated 2026-07-16