OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
0%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
The robots can help. They can’t replace the room you read.
33% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Mostly safe. AI helps around the edges, but the job stays human.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Provide new-employee health and safety orientations and develop materials for these presentations
- Recommend measures to help protect workers from potentially hazardous work methods, processes, or materials
- Develop or maintain hygiene programs, such as noise surveys, continuous atmosphere monitoring, ventilation surveys, or asbestos management plans
- "Coordinate ""right-to-know"" programs regarding hazardous chemicals or other substances."
- Analyze incident data to identify trends in injuries, illnesses, accidents, or other hazards
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Conduct safety training or education programs and demonstrate the use of safety equipment
- Collect samples of dust, gases, vapors, or other potentially toxic materials for analysis
- Investigate the adequacy of ventilation, exhaust equipment, lighting, or other conditions that could affect employee health, comfort, or performance
- Collect samples of hazardous materials or arrange for sample collection
- Inspect specified areas to ensure the presence of fire prevention equipment, safety equipment, or first-aid supplies
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 33% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16