COOKEDthe AI job-risk monitorSYSTEM LIVE
◀ scan anotherPOLICE IDENTIFICATION AND RECORDS OFFICERSshare ⧉
EXPOSURE TO AI
35%
MODERATE
OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
4%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
The boring parts are leaving. The judgment stays.

35% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. In the blast radius. A real slice of the work is already automatable. The rest isn’t.

WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
  • Maintain records of evidence and write and review reports
  • Submit evidence to supervisors, crime labs, or court officials for legal proceedings
  • Photograph crime or accident scenes for evidence records
  • Create sketches and diagrams, by hand or computer software, to depict crime scenes
  • Serve as technical advisor and coordinate with other law enforcement workers or legal personnel to exchange information on crime scene collection activities
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
  • Testify in court and present evidence
  • Dust selected areas of crime scene and lift latent fingerprints, adhering to proper preservation procedures
  • Package, store and retrieve evidence
  • Coordinate or conduct instructional classes or in-services, such as citizen police academy classes and crime scene training for other officers
  • Perform emergency work during off-hours
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY)  | how this is calculated  | last updated 2026-07-16