OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
0%
of this role’s work is already showing up in real Claude usage (Anthropic Economic Index).
The robots can help. They can’t replace the room you read.
24% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Mostly safe. AI helps around the edges, but the job stays human.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Complete and maintain time and attendance forms and inventory lists
- Document individuals' progress toward meeting their treatment goals
- Evaluate staff performance, recording evaluations on appropriate forms
- Assess the needs and interests of individuals and groups and plan activities accordingly, given the available equipment or facilities
- Evaluate recreation areas, facilities, and services to determine if they are producing desired results
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Enforce rules and regulations of recreational facilities to maintain discipline and ensure safety
- Organize, lead, and promote interest in recreational activities, such as arts, crafts, sports, games, camping, and hobbies
- Administer first aid according to prescribed procedures and notify emergency medical personnel when necessary
- Direct special activities or events, such as aquatics, gymnastics, or performing arts
- Supervise and coordinate the work activities of personnel, such as training staff members and assigning work duties
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 24% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16