OBSERVED IN REAL USE · Anthropic 2026
n/a
Not yet measured in the Anthropic Economic Index. The exposure figure is a capability estimate only.
Mostly fireproof. AI hands you the paperwork and steps back.
27% of this role’s O*NET tasks are within reach of today’s AI. That is the core-weighted exposure score from Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”). It measures a capability ceiling, not a headcount forecast. Mostly safe. AI helps around the edges, but the job stays human.
WHAT AI CAN ALREADY DO
- Describe tour points of interest to group members, and respond to questions
- Perform clerical duties, such as filing, typing, operating switchboards, or routing mail and messages
- Speak foreign languages to communicate with foreign visitors
- Research various topics, including site history, environmental conditions, and clients' skills and abilities to plan appropriate expeditions, instruction, and commentary
- Provide directions and other pertinent information to visitors
WHAT IT STILL CAN’T
- Escort individuals or groups on cruises, sightseeing tours, or through places of interest, such as industrial establishments, public buildings, or art galleries
- Monitor visitors' activities to ensure compliance with establishment or tour regulations and safety practices
- Conduct educational activities for school children
- Provide for physical safety of groups, performing such activities as providing first aid or directing emergency evacuations
- Assemble and check the required supplies and equipment prior to departure
THE HONEST PART. A percentage is not a pink slip. High exposure usually means a role shrinks and shifts toward judgment, direction and responsibility: the parts a model can’t sign its name to. Exposure ≠ displacement. Breathe.
"My job is 27% cooked. What’s yours?"
SOURCES: O*NET 30.3 occupational tasks · Eloundou et al. 2023 (“GPTs are GPTs”,
arXiv:2303.10130) · Anthropic Economic Index 2026 (CC-BY) |
how this is calculated |
last updated 2026-07-16